Apparently THE only problem the State legislation of New Hampshire has to debate are the merits of anal sex. Or at least that seems to be the case in Representative Nancy Elliot’s small corner of the State capital.
Elliot’s problem with the idea of gay marriage seems to be entirely fixated on one subject; anal sex. Never mind that a vast majority of heterosexual couples enjoy and engage in anal sex. In Elliot’s world ONLY sick and perverted homosexuals engage in this despicable practice. In Elliot’s mind allowing gay marriage means that the school classrooms will be full of anal sex education! “[W]e’re talking about taking the penis of a man and putting it in the rectum of another man and wiggling around in excitement. And you have to think, would I want that done to me?”
And you thought the era of lurid statements in government proceedings and their pre-occupation with sex vanished with Bill Clinton; evidently not in New Hampshire. Thank you State Representative Nancy Elliot for single handedly bringing government debate to a new low! I’m sure you make the State of New Hampshire proud.
© 2010, edward. All rights reserved.
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.



Seems like a totally ridiculous “argument”. Marriage is NOT about sex acts. ~Butt~, perhaps it is for HER!
Marriage is about two people committing to each other. Gender and orientation should be irrelevant.